CATSprint

CAT 2025Slot 2DILRQues & Sol

Data InterpretationMedium

Data Set

Ananya Raga, Bhaskar Tala, Charu Veena, and Devendra Sur are four musicians. Each of them started and completed their training as students under each of three Gurus — Pandit Meghnath, Ustad Samiran, and Acharya Raghunath between 2013 and 2024, including both the years. Each Guru trains any student for consecutive years only, for a span of 2, 3, or 4 years, with each Guru having a different span. During some of these years, a student may not have trained under these Gurus; however, they never trained under multiple Gurus in the same year. In none of these years, any of these Gurus trained more than two of these students at the same time. When two students train under the same Guru at the same time, they are referred to as Gurubhai, irrespective of their gender.

The following additional facts are known.

1. Ustad Samiran never trained more than one of these students in the same year.
2. Acharya Raghunath did not train any of these students during 2015-2018, as well as during 2021-24.
3. Ananya and Devendra were never Gurubhai; neither were Bhaskar and Charu. All other pairs of musicians were Gurubhai for exactly 2 years.
4. In 2013, Ananya and Bhaskar started their trainings under Pandit Meghnath and under Ustad Samiran, respectively.

Question 1

In which of the following years were Ananya and Bhaskar Gurubhai?

Solution

Setup: We use the constraints on Acharya Raghunath's (AR) active years, Ustad Samiran's (US) one-student-per-year rule, and the Gurubhai pairing conditions to fully reconstruct the training schedule. We denote Ananya, Bhaskar, Charu, Devendra as A, B, C, D and the Gurus as PM, US, AR.

Steps:

  1. AR's span must be 2 years: AR is blocked from 2015–2018 and 2021–2024, meaning he can only teach in {2013, 2014} and {2019, 2020} — two windows of 2 consecutive years each. Since each Guru teaches each student for a single consecutive span of 2, 3, or 4 years, and AR can only offer 2-year blocks, AR's span must be 2 years.
  2. AR teaches C and D in 2013–2014, and A and B in 2019–2020: AR must teach all 4 students but can only train 2 at a time per year. In 2013, A is with PM and B is with US, so AR must take C and D in 2013–2014. The remaining students A and B go to AR in 2019–2020. This gives us the Gurubhai pair {A, B} together under AR for 2019–2020 and {C, D} together under AR for 2013–2014.
  3. US has span 3, PM has span 4: US trains only 1 student per year. If US had a 4-year span, he'd need 4 × 4 = 16 student-years, but only 12 years are available (2013–2024), making it impossible. So US has a 3-year span (needing 12 years total) and PM has a 4-year span. US starts with B in 2013, so B trains under US from 2013–2015.
  4. Remaining Gurubhai pairs {A,C} and {B,D} must each overlap for exactly 2 years under PM: Since US never has 2 students simultaneously and AR's schedule is fixed, all remaining Gurubhai overlaps must happen under PM. A trains under PM from 2013–2016. For {A, C} to share exactly 2 years, C must start PM in 2015 (overlapping 2015–2016), and C trains under PM from 2015–2018. D then trains under PM from 2019–2022. For {B, D} to share exactly 2 years under PM, D and B overlap in 2021–2022 (B trains under PM from 2021–2024 — confirmed by US schedule filling: D under US 2016–2018, C under US 2019–2021, A under US 2022–2024, B under PM 2021–2024).
  5. Ananya and Bhaskar are Gurubhai in 2019–2020 (both under AR). Among the given options, only 2020 falls in this window.

Final Answer: 2020 (Option A)

Question 2

In which year did Charu begin her training under Pandit Meghnath?

Solution

Setup: We use the established training schedule (derived from AR's blocked years, US's one-student rule, span assignments, and Gurubhai pairing constraints) to pin down exactly when Charu began training under PM.

Steps:

  1. PM has a 4-year span and A trains under PM from 2013–2016: From clue 4, A starts with PM in 2013. Since PM's span is 4 years, A trains with PM through 2016. After 2016, A is done with PM.
  2. {A, C} must be Gurubhai for exactly 2 years, and this can only happen under PM: US never pairs students, AR's schedule is already fixed (C is with AR in 2013–2014, not with PM). So {A, C} must overlap under PM. A is with PM only from 2013–2016.
  3. For exactly 2 years of overlap, C must start PM in 2015: If C starts in 2013, they'd overlap for 4 years (too many). If C starts in 2014, they'd overlap for 3 years (too many). If C starts in 2015, they overlap in 2015 and 2016 — exactly 2 years. If C starts in 2016, only 1 year of overlap. Therefore, C must start PM in 2015, training through 2018 (4-year span).
  4. Verification: C under AR: 2013–2014. C under PM: 2015–2018. C under US: 2019–2021. All three gurus covered, no overlaps, all within 2013–2024. ✓

Final Answer: 2015 (Option B)

Question 3

In which of the following years were Bhaskar and Devendra Gurubhai?

Solution

Setup: Using the fully reconstructed schedule, we identify the exact years when Bhaskar (B) and Devendra (D) trained under the same Guru simultaneously. The Gurubhai pair {B, D} must share exactly 2 years under PM (since US never pairs students and AR's pairing slots are already assigned to other pairs).

Steps:

  1. D trains under PM from 2019–2022: After AR fills 2013–2014 with C and D, and C fills PM from 2015–2018, the next PM slot opens in 2019. D is the only student available in 2019 (A and B are with AR, C just finished PM). So D trains under PM from 2019–2022 (4-year span).
  2. B must train under PM for {B, D} to be Gurubhai for exactly 2 years: B's schedule: US from 2013–2015, AR from 2019–2020. B still needs to train under PM. For {B, D} to share exactly 2 years under PM, and D is with PM from 2019–2022, B must overlap with D for exactly 2 years. B must join PM in 2021 (overlapping 2021 and 2022), training under PM from 2021–2024.
  3. Verification of B's full schedule: B under US: 2013–2015. B under AR: 2019–2020. B under PM: 2021–2024. No gaps or overlaps, all within 2013–2024. {B, D} are Gurubhai in 2021 and 2022.
  4. From the options given, 2022 is the only year that falls within the 2021–2022 Gurubhai window for B and D.

Final Answer: 2022 (Option A)

Question 4

Which of the following statements is TRUE?

Solution

Setup: We verify each statement against the fully reconstructed schedule. The final schedule is: A: PM 2013–2016, AR 2019–2020, US 2022–2024. B: US 2013–2015, AR 2019–2020, PM 2021–2024. C: AR 2013–2014, PM 2015–2018, US 2019–2021. D: AR 2013–2014, US 2016–2018, PM 2019–2022.

Steps:

  1. Statement 1 — Charu under US in 2018: C's US training is from 2019–2021. In 2018, C was under PM (2015–2018). This statement is FALSE.
  2. Statement 2 — Ananya under US in 2015: A's US training is from 2022–2024. In 2015, A was under PM (2013–2016). This statement is FALSE.
  3. Statement 3 — Ananya under US in 2018: A's US training is from 2022–2024. In 2018, A was not training under any Guru (A finished PM in 2016 and didn't start AR until 2019). This statement is FALSE.
  4. Statement 4 — Charu under US in 2019: C's US training is from 2019–2021. In 2019, C had just completed PM (2015–2018) and began US training. This statement is TRUE.

Final Answer: Charu was training under Ustad Samiran in 2019 (Option D)

Question 5

In how many of the years between 2013-24, were only two of these four musicians training under these three Gurus?

Solution

Setup: Using the complete reconstructed schedule, we count the number of students actively training in each year from 2013 to 2024, then identify years where exactly 2 of the 4 musicians were training.

Steps:

  1. Compile the full schedule year by year:
    • 2013: A(PM), B(US), C(AR), D(AR) → 4 students
    • 2014: A(PM), B(US), C(AR), D(AR) → 4 students
    • 2015: A(PM), B(US), C(PM) → 3 students (D not training)
    • 2016: A(PM), C(PM), D(US) → 3 students (B not training)
    • 2017: A(PM), C(PM), D(US) → 3 students (B not training)
    • 2018: C(PM), D(US) → 2 students (A and B not training)
    • 2019: A(AR), B(AR), C(US), D(PM) → 4 students
    • 2020: A(AR), B(AR), C(US), D(PM) → 4 students
    • 2021: B(PM), C(US), D(PM) → 3 students (A not training)
    • 2022: A(US), B(PM), D(PM) → 3 students (C not training)
    • 2023: A(US), B(PM) → 2 students (C and D not training)
    • 2024: A(US), B(PM) → 2 students (C and D not training)
  2. Identify years with exactly 2 students training: 2018, 2023, and 2024 show exactly 2 students.

Wait — re-checking 2018: C(PM: 2015–2018 ✓), D(US: 2016–2018 ✓), A not training (PM ended 2016, AR starts 2019), B not training (US ended 2015, AR starts 2019). Yes, exactly 2.

For 2023 and 2024: A(US: 2022–2024 ✓), B(PM: 2021–2024 ✓), C done (US ended 2021, all gurus complete), D done (PM ended 2022, all gurus complete). Exactly 2 students.

  1. Recheck 2015: A(PM ✓), B(US: 2013–2015 ✓), C(PM: starts 2015 ✓), D not yet with US (starts 2016). That's 3 students. **

Recheck all years carefully:** Years with exactly 2: 2018 (C and D), 2023 (A and B), 2024 (A and B). That gives 3 — but the answer is 4.

Re-examining: In 2016, A(PM: 2013–2016 ✓), C(PM: 2015–2018 ✓), D(US: 2016–2018 ✓), B not training (US ended 2015, next is AR 2019–2020, then PM 2021–2024). That's 3. In 2017: A(PM ✓), C(PM ✓), D(US ✓) = 3.

Checking 2021: B(PM: 2021–2024 ✓), C(US: 2019–2021 ✓), D(PM: 2019–2022 ✓), A not training (AR ended 2020, US starts 2022). That's 3 students. So years with exactly 2: 2018, 2023, 2024, and also checking 2022: A(US: 2022–2024 ✓), B(PM: 2021–2024 ✓), C not training (US ended 2021, all done), D(PM: 2019–2022 ✓). That's 3 in 2022.

The four years with exactly 2 students are: 2018 (C, D), 2017 — re-examine: A(PM 2013–2016, so NOT in 2017), C(PM 2015–2018 ✓), D(US 2016–2018 ✓), B not training. That gives 2 students in 2017! And 2023, 2024 also give 2. So the 4 years are 2017, 2018, 2023, 2024.

Final Answer: 4